1. Which practical skills and methodologies have you
developed within this module and how effectively do you think you are employing
them within your own practice?
I’ve
had a lot more consideration for design within this brief, having to
combine real and imaginary environments and maintain a thematic consistency
within the constraints of the two. I do think I have quite effectively achieved
this, with all that I have shown the book, getting the idea thanks to this. I
didn’t go too with new materials, only really dabbling in gouache and copic
markers. Gouache im not necessarily feeling but with a bit of practice could
come to enjoy, the markers I love, and cant wait to find an excuse to use them
in a future project.
2. Which approaches to research have you found
most valuable during this module. How have you interrogated your research
to identify appropriate ideas?
Visiting
the holiday home was simply a great experience in itself on a personal level,
getting to bid farewell to the location and its memories. Although it didn’t
amount to much it was nice to sketch the odd characters and make notes on the
tube, It certainly beat staring in to space and I should get used to doing that
from hereon out as it only further advances me as an image maker. Having specific
breakthrough thanks to artist research was great too, never forget to keep
others work to hand for inspiration.
3. What strengths can you identify within your
submission and how have you capitalised on these? What aspects of your
submission are you satisfied with?
I think the blueprint pages are to a good standard and are full of
energy within the character illustrations, with some peers noting that they
look animated. This is good, I wanted that to be the case, its supposed to be
lively, being a child’s imagination. I am quite proud of this side.
4. What areas for further development can you
identify within your submission and how will you address these in the future?
Whelp, there’s a lot to cover here as I’m actually not too happy with
the overall outcome, sure I think the blueprint pays off, but the polaroid’s
totally betray it. They’re just so flat and identical in presentation, peers
have told me this is good and gives a professional finish, but that’s exactly
the problem. It’s so sterile and I feel as though it completely kills the
personality, the me in the work. I could blame this on the Photoshop file
breaking and forcing my hand but that wouldn’t have been an issue had I more
time to spend on it. This lack of time was absolutely of my own fault also,
having nil motivation and leaving everything to the absolute last minute, it
just isn’t good and most certainly will not be the case from hereon out. A
final note, and also a bi product of doing everything later, there is little
experimentation, with this being a very linear process, absolutely not the way
it should be.
5. How effectively are you making decisions about
the development of your work? What strategies inform this decision making?
I did rely upon a lot of peer feedback for this assignment, with many
breakthroughs coming from exterior sources. This has been incredibly helpful
and will most definitely be utilised in the future, especially seen as the
opportunity wont last for ever.
6. How effectively have you managed this project and
organised yourself during this module?
I think my answer to four pretty much sums this up, I am
super annoyed with myself for slipping up to this extent for the project.
Thankfully I still generated a worthwhile outcome, but will admit that I don’t feel
that it deserves to be that way, live and learn, that’s what I need to keep in
mind.
7.How would you grade yourself on the following areas:
(please indicate using an ‘x’)
5= excellent, 4 = very good, 3 = good, 2 = average,
1 = poor
|
|||||
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
Attendance
|
x
|
||||
Punctuality
|
x
|
||||
Motivation
|
x
|
||||
Commitment
|
x
|
||||
Quantity of work produced
|
x
|
||||
Quality of work produced
|
x
|
||||
Contribution to the group
|
x
|
No comments:
Post a Comment